View Full Version : Stock 1/4 mile times for 87 iroc
CamaroRobZ28beer
08-12-2006, 05:30 PM
???
TransamLover86
08-12-2006, 07:56 PM
15.4 @89mph
TA_GTA
08-12-2006, 09:04 PM
15.3
89vert
08-12-2006, 09:33 PM
I ran a 15.0 bone stock in my vert
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
TA_GTA
08-13-2006, 08:11 PM
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph* :fingersx:
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
15.0
Dizzle
08-14-2006, 07:28 PM
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
not-even-close-to-fucking-stock
89vert
08-14-2006, 09:52 PM
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
not-even-close-to-fucking-stock
*not-even-fucking-close-to-stock
MonkeyWrench
08-14-2006, 10:00 PM
if my g-tech is hafe acc i ran a 14.64 @97.89 think i could do better on a realy track where you hook
CamaroRobZ28beer
08-14-2006, 10:59 PM
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z 6.6 14.9
you forgot that RS was z28 retarded cousin
if my g-tech is hafe acc i ran a 14.64 @97.89 think i could do better on a realy track where you hook
yes, yes you could.
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
not-even-close-to-fucking-stock
*not-even-fucking-close-to-stock
its just your engine, in my car. ::)
89vert
08-22-2006, 06:08 PM
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
not-even-close-to-fucking-stock
*not-even-fucking-close-to-stock
its just your engine, in my car.* ::)
Dan was quoting me,
I corrected his quote :p
wasn't talking about your car,
your car doesn't have the same motor as mine either :p
Mines MAF and will be a 350 soon and/or a 383 later ;)
and my car with me driving has I bet 600#'s on your car :)
1991 RS 14.7@94.5mph :fingersx:
not-even-close-to-fucking-stock
*not-even-fucking-close-to-stock
its just your engine, in my car.* ::)
Dan was quoting me,
I corrected his quote :p
wasn't talking about your car,
your car doesn't have the same motor as mine either :p
Mines MAF and will be a 350 soon and/or a 383 later ;)
and my car with me driving has I bet 600#'s on your car :)
i meant dan :p
and were not going to speak about your 350tpi.
jerk :'(
Captain Morgan
08-23-2006, 05:19 PM
OK i keep hearing, or seeing.... these comments where people are bragging about having a heavier car that goes fast. this is exactly like saying "haha i cut my leg off and still kicked your ass"
personally id rather take an ass kicking and keep my leg.
89vert
08-23-2006, 05:32 PM
OK i keep hearing, or seeing.... these comments where people are bragging about having a heavier car that goes fast. this is exactly like saying "haha i cut my leg off and still kicked your ass"
personally id rather take an ass kicking and keep my leg.
personnaly I'd rather have a good looking car with no roof that goes slow,
when I want to go fast it'll be fast
same arguement has been going on for years, Mustang guys always throw 350 vs 302 or whatever the fuck a 4.6L is,
but camaros got like 400 or 500# on a Mustang,
in the end when it comes to racing weight is just as important as power
I'd be embarrased if I got my ass kicked by a guy with 1 leg, same as if somebody with the same power as me ran 1/4 faster and weighed more :p
Captain Morgan
08-23-2006, 05:53 PM
you get over embarrasment.
you dont get over ignorance
89vert
08-23-2006, 06:04 PM
like Jason siad, he'd be running solid 9's if he went the same as everyone else and did a stang, instead of a camaro,
but in the end who wants to drive a stang, or an RS for that matter :kekeke:
Captain Morgan
08-24-2006, 05:53 AM
well its not like you cant drive a heavier car i just dont see the logic in bragging about a disadvantage.
like Jason siad, he'd be running solid 9's if he went the same as everyone else and did a stang, instead of a camaro,
but in the end who wants to drive a stang, or an RS for that matter :kekeke:
:'(
CamaroRobZ28beer
02-01-2007, 11:59 PM
apparently there is alot of intake differences between my 87 tpi and any of the newer ones especially the 90s ones, hell if you look at them they look different
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Beta 6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.